Skip to main content
Compare · Permit.io

EnforceAuth vs Permit.io

EnforceAuth vs Permit.io compares action-time authorization platforms for the AI era. EnforceAuth is an OPA-native control plane that decides what authenticated identities may do at action time across enterprise domains, not prompt-layer permissions alone. Operate EnforceAuth from Claude, Cursor or ChatGPT through our hosted MCP server.

EnforceAuth is permissions for the AI era, decided at action time: policy-as-code on customer-deployed OPA, with Herald so agents operate the same control plane.

Use EnforceAuth when you need OPA compatibility, a path off Styra, coverage across apps, infrastructure, data, and AI, and a decision receipt for every action.

Read /runtime-authorization and /agentic-identity for how EnforceAuth handles runtime decisions and agent identity.

Permit.io's pricing page lists a free Community tier of 1,000 monthly active users, 20 tenants, and 14-day log retention. Enterprise pricing is by contact [1].

Common questions

Direct answers

Every privileged action is evaluated when it happens — with context — instead of relying only on login-time roles or standing privileges.

Sources

Sources

  1. Permit.io pricing page: “MAU 1000”. https://www.permit.io/pricing (accessed October 21, 2026)

Close the gap with policy-as-code

Free tier includes 1M authorization decisions / month. No card required.