EnforceAuth vs Oso
EnforceAuth vs Oso contrasts an OPA-native enterprise control plane (EnforceAuth) with application-centric authorization libraries and platforms. EnforceAuth focuses on continuous runtime authorization across apps, infrastructure, data, and AI agents. Operate EnforceAuth from Claude, Cursor or ChatGPT through our hosted MCP server.
Buyers evaluating Oso often need fine-grained authorization inside application code. EnforceAuth targets the same fine-grained outcome with policy-as-code on OPA plus a shared control plane for NHI and AI agents.
EnforceAuth closes the Authorization Gap when identity is proven and action-time policy is missing, with one control plane across applications, infrastructure, data, and agents.
See the buyer criteria at /blog/buyers-guide-ai-agent-authorization-five-criteria and fine-grained authorization at /fine-grained-authorization.
Oso's pricing page states that Oso has been acquired by Tiny. Oso for Agents lists Developer at $0 for 3 users and Growth at $15 per user per month. Oso defines a user as a human invoking agents [1].
Common questions
Direct answers
Sources
Sources
- Oso pricing page: “Oso has been acquired by Tiny”. https://www.osohq.com/pricing (accessed October 21, 2026)
Close the gap with policy-as-code
Free tier includes 1M authorization decisions / month. No card required.